Updating in linq john mayer cameron diaz dating
This seems to be easy to just catch Db Update Concurrency Exception and do nothing, then database naturally wins, and retains its values: However, this way leaves the Db Context, the conflicting entity, and the entity’s tracking information in a corrupted state.
To required EF/Core to check a certain property, just add a System. Microsoft’s Adventure Works sample database does not have such a rowversion column, so create one for the Production.
Then reader Writer2 retries to save the product changes again. As discussed above, to resolve a concurrency conflict, the entity and its tracking information need to be refreshed.
This time, Save Changes should succeed, because there is no conflicts anymore (In this example, there are only 2 database clients reading/writing data concurrently. So the more specific Save Changes overloads can be implemented by applying refresh for each conflict: A Refresh Conflict enumeration has to be defined with 3 members to represent the 3 options discussed above: database wins, client wind, merge client and database..
The following example updates and and deletes the same product concurrently: Inherited from Db Update Exception, Db Update Concurrency Exception has an Entries property.
Entries returns a sequence of Entity Entry instances, representing the conflicting entities’ tracking information.
The basic idea of resolving concurrency conflicts, is to handle Db Update Concurrency Exception and retry Save Changes: In the above Write overload, if Save Changes throws Db Update Concurrency Exception, the handle Exception function is called.